Previous Page | Table
of Contents | Next Page
Downloadable
/ Printable Version
This is the last page of the
free study guide for "The World is Flat" by Thomas L. Friedman.
The complete study guide is currently available as a downloadable
PDF,
RTF,
or MS
Word DOC file from the PinkMonkey MonkeyNotes
download store. The complete study guide contains summaries and
notes for all of the chapters; analysis of the structure, and notable
figures; important quotations and analysis; a key facts summary; a
multiple-choice quiz, a quote matching quiz, a vocabulary section
and suggested book report ideas and essay topics.
In chapter 10, “The Virgin of Guadalupe,” Friedman considers what policies
developing countries must carry out to thrive in the flattening world.
Friedman asserts that the first step developing nations must take when
thinking about the flat world is introspection. The country must honestly
consider where it stands in relation to the ten flatteners. Next countries
must commit to more open and competitive markets because these tools are
the only avenue out of poverty. As Friedman has argued previously in this
text, for a nation to develop in the flat world, it must cultivate three
elements: infrastructure; proper education; and the right governance.
Developing nations must build business-friendly environments-- that
is, they must create regulations that make it easy to start, manage, and
close businesses. Friedman then offers Ireland as an example of a nation
that went from “the sick man of Europe to the rich man” by addressing
infrastructure, education, and governance. Today, Ireland is the richest
nation in the European Union after Luxembourg. Friedman contends that
the case of Ireland proves that capital does not simply seek the cheapest
labor; this is why all jobs do not go to Haiti. Instead, capital seeks
the most productive labor at the cheapest price. Ireland became such a
success because it mastered infrastructure, education, and governance.
Friedman believes that to truly understand a country’s economic performance,
one must consider its culture. Although, as Friedman is careful to point
out, culture is only one of many elements and not the sole determining
factor of a nation’s potential. He acknowledges that this is a controversial
topic, but believes it is essential to his investigation. Friedman argues
that open cultures, which are best able to adopt global best practices
and willing to change--versus closed cultures, which promote tradition
and national solidarity--have the best chance for success in the flat
world. Friedman invokes David Landes’s argument in The Wealth and Poverty
of Nations to consider how tribal culture in the Arab-Muslim world
has limited various nations’ success in the flat world. Landes notes that
certain cultural mores, such as preventing women from entering the public
sphere, limit a nation’s development. In keeping women out of the workforce,
nations that support this view eliminate half of the talent pool. Still,
Friedman observes that even when nations get it right--reform wholesale,
reform retail, maintain good governance, infrastructure, and education,
as well as glocalize--some proceed in a sustained manner while others
do not. Friedman calls the missing element “the intangible things.” Friedman
boils the intangibles down to two basic elements: a willing society and
leaders with vision. Finally Friedman provides a comparison between Mexico
and China to show how Mexico failed and China succeeded.
This section of the text confirms that Friedman’s main concern with
the flattening of the world is the U.S.’s place in the new order because
it covers the rest of the world in one chapter, after having spent five
chapters considering what the flat world meant for the United States.
Friedman enters an interesting debate in this chapter, which Jared Diamond
in Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fate
of Human Societies defined as “Yali’s Question.”
Yali, a New Guinea native asked Diamond why his country had so much more
stuff than New Guinea. Diamond argues that because of specific geographic,
environmental, and biological forces, the fates of human societies were
set by 1500. This assertion conflicts with Landes’s cultural analysis,
but through comparison, might serve as an interesting way to critique
Friedman. For example, does it matter that some underdeveloped nations
are primarily comprised of deserts (African nations, for example). Would
Friedman’s suggestions work in any geographical location as long as the
culture was open to change?
This is the last page of the
free study guide for "The World is Flat" by Thomas L. Friedman.
The complete study guide is currently available as a downloadable PDF,
RTF,
or MS
Word DOC file from the PinkMonkey MonkeyNotes
download store. The complete study guide contains summaries and notes
for all of the chapters; analysis of the structure, and notable figures;
important quotations and analysis; a key facts summary; a multiple-choice
quiz, a quote matching quiz, a vocabulary section and suggested book report
ideas and essay topics.
Cite this page:
TheBestNotes.com Staff. "TheBestNotes on The World is Flat".
TheBestNotes.com.
. <%
varLocale = SetLocale(2057)
file = Request.ServerVariables("PATH_TRANSLATED")
Set fs = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
Set f = fs.GetFile(file)
LastModified = f.datelastmodified
response.write FormatDateTime(LastModified, 1)
Set f = Nothing
Set fs = Nothing
%> |